See Where EMS-to-Hospital Workflows Are Costing You Time and Money
Hospitals already have the data to improve clinical, operational, and strategic decisions.
ImageTrend’s Carelytics makes it work for you.
Take the quiz below to discover your ROI in minutes.
What Is Disconnected EMS Data Costing Your Health System?
Take this quick 5-question assessment to identify where manual EMS-to-hospital workflows may be creating avoidable cost, operational friction, data reliability issues, and missed visibility across your health system.
Get Your EMS-to-Hospital Data Efficiency Score
When EMS records are received, how reliably do they land in the right place within your hospital’s EHR workflow?
Please select an answer to continue.
How confident are you that incoming EMS records are tied to the correct patient and hospital encounter?
Please select an answer to continue.
About how many EMS-related demographic, insurance, face sheet, or outcome requests does your organization manually process each month?
Please select an answer to continue.
How consistently can your organization return outcome, demographic, insurance, or billing-related information back to EMS partners?
Please select an answer to continue.
How scalable is your current EMS-hospital data exchange model across facilities, EMS partners, regions, file types, and technical environments?
Please select an answer to continue.
Almost there! Enter your information to see your results.
There was an error submitting the form. Please try again.
Assessment Complete
Here’s Your Workflow Impact Assessment
Your Outcome
- Mature Workflow
- Moderate Operational Burden
- High Workflow Friction
- Enterprise-Level Modernization Opportunity
Recommended Next Step
Did You Know?
- Manual work in healthcare is not just inconvenient — it is expensive at scale. The 2025 CAQH Index found that electronic transactions and improved data exchange helped U.S. healthcare avoid an estimated $258 billion in administrative costs in 2024, while full automation of remaining manual and partially manual transactions could unlock an additional $21 billion in savings opportunity.
- Closed-loop data sharing is more important than ever because incomplete or delayed information can create downstream administrative work. Premier reported that claims adjudication cost healthcare providers more than $25.7 billion in 2023, with nearly $18 billion potentially wasted arguing over claims that were ultimately paid. The administrative cost of fighting denials increased to $57.23 per claim.
- Patient matching issues create both clinical and financial risk. Pew has reported that inadequate patient matching can lead to duplicate tests and procedures, citing survey findings that repeated services caused by duplicate records cost an average of $1,950 per inpatient stay. Pew also notes that hospitals can lose revenue when claims are denied because of patient identification inaccuracies.
- It is not enough for outside clinical data to simply exist — it has to surface in the right workflow. Epic Research found that more than 5.8 million duplicate imaging orders were prevented or potentially prevented over one year, representing an estimated $310 million to $523 million in potential savings.
- Scalable interoperability has measurable financial implications. The California Health Care Foundation summarized evidence showing that health information exchange can reduce duplicate testing, including a $1,037 average charge reduction per ED visit and nearly $2,000 per patient in some emergency department cases.
- EMS-hospital inefficiency can carry measurable system cost. A California Hospital Association toolkit cites EMS offload delay examples totaling $3 million in lost unit hours across Riverside and San Bernardino Counties and $2.6 million at one Sacramento hospital.
Your EMS data should do more than arrive eventually.
Capture complete prehospital information digitally, automatically, and in real time — at scale. Request a demo to see how Carelytics is helping organizations:
- Receive ePCRs automatically integrated as structured fields into the EHR workflow — without scanning or manual entry.
- Automatically match EMS records to the correct hospital encounter using registration data, eliminating manual reconciliation delays.
- Close the loop with automated EMS exchange, including face sheet updates, patient outcomes, billing data, and more — cutting follow-up calls and administrative costs.
- Access real-time EMS transport patterns inside your walls and across your service area to uncover clinical and operational trends, referrals, market share insights, and more — without relying on delayed claims data.
